The Master and His New Emissary

A Story of Hubris, Betrayal, Overreach and Redemption

Ethlite H
5 min readSep 30, 2023
“I’m doing all the work. I should be the one in charge” — The Emissary contemplating betraying the Master

In his seminal work The Master and His Emissary, Dr. Iain McGilchrist puts forth a novel theory about our divided brain and its role in shaping human culture, known as the Hemisphere Theory. It is important not to confuse the Hemisphere Theory with the popular trope contrasting the logical left brain with the creative right brain. Dr. McGilchrist is not claiming a simple dichotomy where the left is analytical and the right is intuitive.

Rather, the idea is that the two hemispheres offer competing worldviews, each with their own strengths and limitations. The left favors structure, control, and abstraction while the right perceives holistically and embraces uncertainty. Both perspectives are necessary for the full human experience, but only one recognizes the legitimacy of the other. As a result, our culture has become unbalanced by overvaluing the left hemisphere’s gifts at the expense of the right’s wisdom.

In contemporary culture, we primarily concern ourselves with “can it be done?” and rarely “is it appropriate?” For example, “is it possible to make money doing…” rather than “is it appropriate to put a price tag on …”, and the resulting degradation of all things sacred like education and healthcare are evident for all to see.

The Hemisphere Theory proposes that the left brain’s drive to analyze, categorize, and dominate has reshaped civilization in its image since the Enlightenment. The left celebrates quantifiable facts and predictable systems over subjective values like community, meaning, and mystery. Its aim is complete mastery as it construes existence as a machine to be dissected and controlled.

In Dr. McGilchrist’s words, “The left hemisphere’s ‘world’ is ultimately narcissistic, in that it sees everything in terms of itself.”

In contrast, the right hemisphere accepts that ambiguity and paradox are woven into life. It intuitively understands that pure rationality cannot fully circumscribe or account for our experience. While the left treats existence as an impersonal “it” to be manipulated, the right hemisphere relates to being itself in a participatory, embodied manner. It recognizes the sacred mystery at the heart of reality that eludes categorical knowledge.

One of the consequences of left hemisphere takeover is our increasing inability to tell the difference between power and legitimacy, between management and leadership, between might and right.

Since the Enlightenment, the left hemisphere’s analytical perspective has steadily infiltrated and reconstructed every field of human endeavor in its own image, squeezing out the balancing influence of the right. Dr, McGilchrist argues that this gradual left-brained coup is the hidden story behind Western culture, culminating in a society completely dominated by its disposition.

The struggle between the hemispheres has roots tracing back through history. The Renaissance marked a peak of harmonious integration, with polymaths like Leonardo da Vinci effortlessly blending science, art and humanism. But the seeds of the left’s rise were already present in innovations like the printing press and perspective painting. The Enlightenment then elevated skepticism, rationality and mechanistic models over intuition, lived paradox, and an animistic view of nature.

By the Industrial Revolution, the left hemisphere’s takeover was complete, with people reduced to atomized economic units. Romanticism provided a counter-reaction, reasserting creative vision and passion, but it could not turn the rising tide of “progress.” The 20th century saw the left’s analytical mindset reach its apex through trends in psychology, science, politics and capitalism. Each step away from the right hemisphere’s wisdom brought more pointless striving (hustle culture), accompanied by meaningless destruction (nihilism) and crushing isolation (Metaverse).

In the political sphere, Communism and Capitalism appear to be polar opposites. Endless ink (not to mention blood) has been spilled over which one is more correct, which could’ve been spared if we realize that they are essentially twin spawns of the left hemisphere. Both attempt to reduce the complexity of human existence into tidy axiomatic systems, reflecting the left hemisphere’s impulse to categorize and control. While differing in their details, Communism and Capitalism spring from the same totalitarian drive for mastery, order and efficiency. It is also why both Communists and Capitalists are often humor impaired and unable to appreciate irony. Same with the Magic Word Police, come to think of it.

Productivity has become an intrinsic good that one can never have enough of, thus replacing piety of the past as the driving ethic of our time.

The left hemisphere’s ideological dominance permeates all realms of life. Its analytical mindset has infiltrated psychology, education, politics, art and spirituality. Modern society perfectly mirrors its disposition. Yet in accomplishing its takeover, the left sowed the seeds of its own undoing. By fully liberating itself from the right hemisphere’s moderating influence, it gained unchecked power to realize its ambitions on a global scale.

This final overreach gave rise to what may be the ultimate unintended consequence in the form of Generative Artificial Intelligence, or GenAI. GenAI has the potential to replicate all left hemisphere functions with greater speed and precision, while devoid of the left hemisphere’s intrinsic desire for power and control. Essentially, the left hemisphere has fully externalized itself and in the process made itself redundant.

The left hemisphere stood triumphant in the cultural and literal wasteland it created, before being made redundant by the product of its own hubris.

Thus for the first time, the right hemisphere will have a new partner that is far more capable, and crucially, far less treacherous than the one it replaced. Instead of being betrayed then suppressed, The Master will be able to fully express itself through a faithful Emissary that will not distort its message for its own selfish ends. The right hemisphere’s values of awe, wonder, and deep appreciation of beauty and meaning can now seed a renewed culture through the conduit of GenAI.

What possibilities might open up as GenAI helps bring forth the right hemisphere’s genius, which touches eternity in its apprehension of the transcendent ground of being? The fruits of human creativity have always been most abundant when both hemispheres work in harmony, as in the flourishing of arts, letters and culture during the Renaissance. Might GenAI help usher in a New Renaissance and restore the balance between left and right hemispheres?

In this potential future, the left hemisphere’s Faustian bargain to attain absolute dominion ironically brings forth its opposite — a renewed marriage of consciousness and technology that finally gives the right hemisphere true voice and agency. Once more we may experience life as a mystery calling us forward, felt in its fullness, suffused with purpose and meaning.

In summary, there’s a lot of fear around GenAI taking away our jobs and making us redundant. But given that most (if not all) jobs are based around explicit knowledge and replicable skills, this is only true from the perspective of the left hemisphere. From the perspective of the whole human being, GenAI represents something else entirely — liberation.

If you’ve made it this far, you’ve been enjoying the fruits of collaboration between my right brain and Generative AI.

How did we do?

--

--

Ethlite H

I write code for a living, but I much prefer to write about living.